🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.